Vendors & software · Verify

Does the FAA approve aircraft-records software for Part 135 electronic logbooks?

Direct answer

No. The FAA authorizes a certificate holder — the operator — to use electronic signatures, electronic recordkeeping systems and electronic manuals through Operations Specification A025, following Advisory Circular 120-78B. The software is named in the operator's A025, but the authorization is the operator's, and using electronic records at all is optional. 12

See what AI says about your company — about a minute, free, no email.

See what AI says about you

What the guidance says

Advisory Circular 120-78B, dated December 11, 2024, "provides approval, acceptance, and authorization guidelines for electronic signatures, electronic recordkeeping systems, and electronic manual systems." 1

Paragraph 1.9.3 states: "The FAA will authorize the use of electronic signatures, electronic recordkeeping systems, and electronic manual systems via OpSpec A025," and "OpSpec A025 authorization is required for 14 CFR parts 91K, 121, 125, 133, 135, 141, 142, 145, and 147." The same paragraph adds: "The use of these electronic systems is optional." 1 The principal inspector's signature on the OpSpec "indicates the FAA's approval or acceptance of the item (depending on the requirement)." 1

The application is the operator's. A certificate holder applies in writing to its Flight Standards office with a letter of intent naming "the kinds of records along with the name of the electronic system." After a demonstration, the FAA authorizes use "by signing and issuing OpSpec A025." 1 The inspector guidance for the Part 135 template has three columns per recordkeeping system: kind of record, "Name of Electronic System" and the manual containing the system description. Part 135 systems are "FAA-accepted"; approval is reserved for Part 121 and 125 crewmember and dispatcher records. 2

What it does not mean

On our reading, "FAA-compliant" or "built to AC 120-78B" on a vendor's page describes a design target, not an FAA review of the product: the AC has no paragraph on reviewing a product apart from a certificate holder, and calls itself "an acceptable means, but not the only means" whose contents "do not have the force and effect of law." 1 Each certificate holder submits its own application, manual and demonstration; one operator's A025 does not transfer to another using the same product. 12

Part 91 operators outside 91K need no A025: electronic use under Part 91 "does not require formal FAA approval, acceptance, or authorization," though the FAA recommends following the AC and "may question" a record missing key elements. 1 An owner-flown aircraft's electronic logbook is therefore a different case from a charter operator's.

Software revision control "is a requirement of" A025 for Part 135, and the process "includes certificate holder notification to the responsible Flight Standards office whenever software revisions affect" record entry, display, access or data quality. 1 While FAA direct access to the system "is voluntary, providing the records themselves is mandatory." 1 A Part 145 repair station's own electronic records go through A025 as well. 1

How to check it yourself

Ask the vendor which A025 table entries its customers hold and which manual describes the system; ask your principal inspector what that description must contain (Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 18, Section 3, Change 1021, February 26, 2026); and confirm on the FAA's advisory circular page that 120-78B is still Active. 23

Why it matters for AI answers

The buyer's question contains a false premise, and an engine will answer it with a product list unless a page states the rule plainly. A vendor's compliance page can carry one checkable sentence: designed to AC 120-78B (December 11, 2024); authorization to use it is the operator's, via OpSpec A025; last confirmed current on a stated date, in HTML. That is the sentence a software vendor wants quoted when a Part 135 operator asks which records software the FAA accepts.

Reviewed against sources on .

You may quote or republish this page with credit to AI Says You and a link to this page, under CC BY 4.0. Quoted third-party material remains its owners'.

  • Charter brokers · Verify

    What does DOT Part 295 require of a charter broker?

    Before contracting for a flight, a broker must disclose the operator's corporate name, its capacity (principal or agent) and whether it holds liability insurance covering the charterer and passengers; on request, total cost, third-party fees and, if it is the charterer's agent, carrier ties. Advertisements must say it is a broker; eleven listed practices are unfair or deceptive.

    Reviewed

  • MROs · Verify

    Does an EASA Part-145 approval let a US shop work on an N-registered aircraft?

    No. 14 CFR § 43.7 names who may approve an N-registered aircraft for return to service: FAA repair station certificate holders among them, plus certain Canadian persons under § 43.17; an EASA Part-145 approval is not on the list. A US shop's EASA approval rides on its FAA certificate under the US–EU bilateral, for products registered or designed in the EU.

    Reviewed

All answers

Find out who AI names when your buyers ask.

About a minute. No email until you want the full Snapshot.